Rohit Sharma's Controversial Super Over during 3rd T20I against AFG: Legal or Not?

Rohit Sharma batting in the 2nd Super Over after retiring out in the 1st is legal in the game of cricket. Learn more about the rules and regulations surrounding Super Overs and player participation.

By Crickified Mohit
New Update

Rohit Sharma with the tournament trophy after winning 3 match T20I series with 3-0 against Afghanistan at M Chinnaswamy Stadium, Bengaluru

In a thrilling encounter between India and Afghanistan, Rohit Sharma's involvement in the second Super Over raised questions about the legality of his participation. Let's delve into the MCC playing conditions and ICC rules to understand whether Rohit's actions were within the boundaries of the game.



Also Read India vs Afghanistan 3rd T20I Highlights

The Super Over Saga


The match between India and Afghanistan took an unexpected turn, leading to not one, but two Super Overs. In the first Super Over, Rohit Sharma was accompanied by Jaiswal, and they managed to take the game down to the wire. With two runs required off the last ball, Rohit retired himself out, bringing in Rinku Singh as his replacement at the non-striker's end. As the match proceeded to another Super Over, Rohit returned to bat alongside Rinku Singh, sparking controversy.

MCC Playing Conditions

According to the MCC playing conditions, if a batter retires due to illness, injury, or any other unavoidable cause, they are entitled to resume their innings. In such cases, if the batter does not return to the crease, they are recorded as 'Retired - not out.' However, if a batter retires for any other reason, their innings can only be resumed with the consent of the opposing captain. If their innings is not resumed, they are recorded as 'Retired - out.'


ICC Rules on Super Overs

The ICC Playing Conditions state that in case of a tied Super Over, any batsman who was dismissed in a previous Super Over is ineligible to bat in subsequent Super Overs. This rule aims to maintain fairness by preventing a team from repeatedly using their best batsmen in successive Super Overs.

Ambiguity Surrounding Rohit Sharma's Retirement


The match officials have not yet clarified whether Rohit Sharma retired out or retired hurt during the first Super Over. If he retired hurt, he would have been eligible to bat again in the second Super Over since he was not out in the previous one. However, if he retired out, his participation in the second Super Over would have been against the ICC rules.

The Importance of Clarity

The lack of clarity regarding Rohit Sharma's retirement in the first Super Over has sparked debates among cricket enthusiasts. It is crucial for match officials to provide a clear explanation to avoid any doubts about the integrity of the game and to uphold the spirit of fair play.


Implications for Future Super Overs

The controversy surrounding Rohit Sharma's participation in the second Super Over highlights the need for more explicit rules regarding retirements in such situations. The ICC should consider revisiting the regulations to ensure a fair and transparent process for all teams involved in tied Super Overs.


While the controversy surrounding Rohit Sharma's involvement in the second Super Over remains unresolved, it is essential for cricket's governing bodies to provide clarity and transparency in such situations. The MCC playing conditions and ICC rules should be reviewed to avoid any ambiguity and ensure fair play. As the cricketing world eagerly awaits an official statement on the matter, it serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the integrity of the game and maintaining a level playing field for all teams involved.

Latest Stories